Kargil/ VOL News Desk/ Following recent changes in Ladakh’s administrative map, particularly the granting of district status to Zanskar and Drass and the notification regarding the formation of Hill Development Councils for these areas, debate has intensified over the political future of the Kargil Hill Development Council.

The resignation of four BJP councillors has raised serious questions regarding the present numerical strength of the Kargil Hill Council, the completion of its five-year term, and the leadership of Chairman and Chief Executive Councillor (CEC) Dr. Mohammad Jaffer Akhoon.

The current situation is not being viewed merely as the resignation of a few councillors. Political circles see it as a development that could have significant consequences for Kargil’s politics in the coming days. There is also speculation that more councillors from Zanskar and councillors associated with Drass could resign in the near future. If this happens, the Council’s political and numerical position could become even more complicated.

* Click to Follow Voice of Ladakh on WhatsApp *

The key question is how Dr. Mohammad Jaffer Akhoon will deal with the crisis and whether he will be able to retain the support required to remain CEC and continue his leadership.

Public opinion remains divided. One section links the current crisis to Dr. Jaffer Akhoon’s earlier political strategy. According to this view, he undermined the political agreement and commitments made with the Congress, and the present crisis is a political consequence of that decision.

The political understanding between Kargil’s two major political parties had reportedly been reached in the presence of Dr. Jaffer Akhoon’s elder brother, the late National Conference leader Qamar Ali Akhoon. Critics argue that moving away from that understanding disturbed the political balance in Kargil and contributed to the present situation.

Supporters of Dr. Jaffer Akhoon, however, present a completely different argument. They maintain that he prioritised Kargil’s broader interests over personal political considerations, particularly the long-standing demand for granting district status to the Sub-Division of Sankoo and advancing Ladakh’s pending demands through engagement with the Central Government.

According to his supporters, Dr. Jaffer Akhoon distanced himself from the political commitments and understanding with the Congress in an effort to strengthen relations with the Central Government and moved closer to the BJP. They argue that this was not done for personal political gain, but with the objective of pursuing Kargil-specific public demands, especially the demand for district status for Sankoo.

The political situation has now raised a fundamental question: Will Dr. Jaffer Akhoon be able to save his position as CEC?

Following the resignation of four BJP councillors, the direction in which the Council’s balance of power moves will be crucial. If additional councillors resign, maintaining the required support could become a major challenge for Dr. Jaffer Akhoon.

The numerical strength of the Council is therefore particularly important. If, under the relevant legal and regulatory provisions, at least 15 councillors are required to support the CEC’s leadership, it will be crucial to determine how many elected councillors currently stand with Dr. Jaffer Akhoon and whether he remains in a position to maintain the required majority.

However, the issue extends beyond the leadership of the Hill Council and the CEC’s position. Closely connected to the entire political situation is the long-standing demand for granting district status to Sankoo, which has remained an important public demand in the region for some time.

Dr. Jaffer Akhoon has repeatedly expressed his commitment to making every possible effort to secure district status for Sankoo. As a result, during the present political crisis, the people of Sankoo and political circles are closely watching what impact the changing political circumstances will have on the future of this demand.

Another important question is what Dr. Jaffer Akhoon’s next political move would be if he fails to retain his position as CEC. Will he continue his political struggle and pursue the demand for Sankoo district status, or will the current political developments force him to adopt a new political strategy?

Similarly, if the demand for Sankoo district status does not materialise under the present circumstances, its political and public consequences could be significant. People who connect the demand with the administrative and developmental needs of the area may judge future political leadership and elected representatives largely in this context.

Overall, the Kargil Hill Council has entered a politically sensitive phase in which political alliances, numerical strength within the Council, the CEC’s leadership, and the demand for Sankoo district status appear increasingly interconnected.

The coming days—particularly any further resignations, the Council’s numerical position, new political alignments, and Dr. Jaffer Akhoon’s strategy—will determine the direction of Kargil Hill Council politics.

For now, the central questions among the public remain: Will Dr. Mohammad Jaffer Akhoon succeed in retaining his leadership, and will he be able to turn his commitment to granting district status to Sankoo into reality?